cycle paths

Keuzeschema sanering palen op fietspaden (selection plan for bollards on cycle paths)

Publisher: 
CROW
Publication date: 
December 2014
Abstract: 

This selection planning document helps road managers to decide on the placement of bollards in cycle paths. In addition, it gives recommendations on the safe design of locations where bollards are deemed necessary. The selection schedule was completely renewed in December 2014 based on extensive practical evaluations.

 

B02 Road Crossings Side Roads

Publisher: 
Cycling England
Publication date: 
August 2008
Abstract: 

Maintaining the continuity of cycle tracks is important if they are to provide an attractive alternative to being on road. Consideration should be given to the use of cycle priority crossings where they cross minor roads where daily traffic flows are below 2000 vehicles per day.

European experience suggests that where the cycle track is used solely by cyclists travelling in the same direction as vehicles on the adjacent traffic lane, returning cyclists to the carriageway before side road junctions can also be an effective solution.

B09 Obstruction Of Cycle Track Accesses

Publisher: 
Cycling England
Publication date: 
August 2008
Abstract: 

Where cycle tracks emerge onto the carriageway, suitable arrangements should be put in place to prevent parked vehicles obstructing access and to ensure adequate visibility (e.g. “Keep Clear” road markings, double yellow lines etc.) (see also A14 Corner Radii, B04 Junction and Forward Visibility and B05 Footway Crossings).

B05 Footway Crossings And Tactile Paving

Publisher: 
Cycling England
Publication date: 
August 2008
Abstract: 

Where cycle tracks cross footways to reach the carriageway, blind and partially sighted pedestrians should be warned by means of corduroy paving. Ladder tactile paving should not be placed in the path of a turning cyclist. The length of ladder paving should be kept to a minimum (800mm) wherever possible (see also B06 Flush Kerbs and B07 Cycle Track Junctions).

B08 Access And Speed Controls

Publisher: 
Cycling England
Publication date: 
August 2008
Abstract: 

There should be a presumption against the use of any access barriers on a cycle track/shared-use path until/unless there is a proven need because of the difficulties they can cause all users. Where it is necessary to reduce the speed of cyclists, 2 rows of staggered bollards are preferred (see also A14 Corner Radii, B04 Junction and Forward Visibility, B05 Footway Crossings and B07 Cycle Track Junctions).

C01 Headroom

Publisher: 
Cycling England
Publication date: 
August 2008
Abstract: 

Headroom in new subways should be a minimum of 2.4m. Existing subways with lower headroom have been successfully converted to cycle use but should be risk assessed and warning signs added where appropriate (see also A15 Audits and Risk Assessment). Signs should be mounted at least 2.3m above the surface of a cycle track.

B04 Junction And Forward Visibility

Publisher: 
Cycling England
Publication date: 
August 2008
Abstract: 

Adequate visibility (20m where the design speed is 12mph) should be provided or measures to manage speed considered (see also B08 Access and Speed Controls).

C02 Surfaces

Publisher: 
Cycling England
Publication date: 
August 2008
Abstract: 

Surfaces should be chosen with due regard to whole-life costs (off-carriageway as well as on). Materials should always be machine laid to ensure a smooth running surface.

For aesthetic, environmental and cost reasons coloured surfaces should only be used at potential hazards and conflict points, or where encroachment by motor vehicles is a problem. Any decision to use coloured surfacing for all cycle facilities will need to balance the potential safety benefits against the future maintenance commitment that will be required.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - cycle paths